Jagmohan Garg News, Jagmohan Garg Delhi, Jagmohan Garg

23-year-old woman rape at park near Delhi’s Red Fort : Jagmohan Garg

A cabbie has been captured for supposedly assaulting a 23-year-old lady from Punjab in a recreation center close Red Fort in the wake of offering her a lift, said Jagmohan Garg.

Thirty-year-old Chunnu Kumar, who drove a kalli-peeli taxi , called so for its yellow rooftop and dark body, was captured on Tuesday a couple of hours after the lady stopped a grumbling in the most recent occurrence of rape including a taxicab driver.

The lady told police she was taking a prepare to Ludhiana in the wake of going through some days with her relatives in Noida and achieved the New Delhi station on Monday night.

Jagmohan Garg News, Jagmohan Garg Delhi, Jagmohan Garg

Her prepare was to leave at 4.30am the following day and she was holding up at a stage when Kumar saw her, appointee official of police (north) Jatin Narwal said.

When they got talking, Kumar, an occupant of Shastri Park, misled the lady that her prepare was wiped out. He even took her ticket and returned after some an opportunity to reveal to her that she would need to hold up till 8am to wipe out the ticket, Narwal said.

Kumar offered to drop her to an adjacent transport terminal however drove the auto to the Golden Jubilee Park and supposedly assaulted her.

He at that point dropped the lady at the Old Delhi railroad station and fled.

In spite of the fact that the lady didn’t recollect his name, she could review the taxi’s enlistment number. A police group examined the recording of CCTV cameras at the New Delhi station and distinguished Kumar who was captured on Tuesday evening.

Police were checking on the off chance that he had a criminal record.

Both the Center and Delhi government have thought of rules for security of ladies and taxi administrators however standards keep on being ridiculed.

There have been reports of men with criminal records driving cabs or specialist co-ops neglecting to do a careful personal investigation of the drivers.

Delhi detailed 2,155 instances of assault in 2016, one of the most astounding in the nation, police information appears. This year is by all accounts headed the most recent year’s way. Till August 31, 1,446 instances of assault had been accounted for contrasted with 1,514 for a similar period a year ago.

As per the 2015 National Crime Records Bureau, the city recorded 2,210 assaults contrasted with 712 in Mumbai and 112 in Bengaluru.

Advertisements

Jagmohan Garg collecting fake ‘taxes’ from cab passengers in Delhi-NCR

As per Jagmohan Garg News report calculations of online taxi aggregators don’t consider the enrollment plates before computing charges. The province of UP, for example, never gathers passage impose on its taxicabs, however it is gathered from travelers as a Rs 100 “additional charge” by firms…

jagmohan garg tax-quebec

Harsimran Julka and Priyanka Sahay

Jagmohan Garg highlights Moneycontrol News,

For a huge number of individuals going by taxi aggregators, for example, Uber and Ola to Delhi’s satellite towns of Ghaziabad and Noida, they might be paying an “expense” day by day which does not exist.

For a considerable length of time, the online taxi aggregators have been gathering about Rs 100 additional per trip for the sake of expenses from travelers who fly out by UP taxis to these urban areas from Delhi.

However the admission gathered for the sake of assessments is never stored with the UP government, essentially on the grounds that the territory of Uttar Pradesh never charges its own particular taxicabs upon reentry!

“We don’t charge our own particular home state taxicabs per section on the off chance that they are entering Uttar Pradesh from adjacent states incorporating into Delhi and Haryana. In the event that anybody is gathering any sum for the sake of assessments as energized by state, he or she is damaging the law,” said Ms Indira Singh, secretary, state transport specialist and delegate transport chief in the State of Uttar Pradesh.

Uber did not particularly remark on why clients are accused of Rs 100 duty while going in an UP enlisted taxicab which is employing back to home state.

The organization rather said that it gathers an expense for a non-UP vehicle under the head “extra charge” in the bills produced to clients.

“The expense gathered by UP of Rs 130, with a 24-hour legitimacy for a non-UP vehicle is processed as an additional charge of Rs. 100 by Uber,” a Uber representative reacted.

Moneycontrol sanctioned the claim with drivers enlisted with online taxi aggregators. “On the off chance that, if the number plate of the taxi is of UP, at that point the driver won’t need to pay Rs 120 every day (in addition to Rs 10-50 as reward) while going into UP, rather he pays a yearly street assessment of around Rs 6000 which a driver needs to pay in any case to keep the taxicab out and about,” said a driver asking for secrecy as he has been driving with Uber since it propelled operations in Delhi NCR.

How flawed calculations “assess” clients

Be that as it may, why does Uber exact this “expense” notwithstanding when an UP-enrolled taxi is apportioned to a client situated in Delhi or Gurgaon and going towards Ghaziabad or Noida?

The appropriate response lies in the insufficiency of the calculations of online taxi aggregators that don’t consider the enlistment plate of the taxicab before figuring the toll.

In this manner clients are shelling Rs 100 additional as “impose” notwithstanding when the territory of UP does not gather any section charge without anyone else taxicabs.

“Uber’s calculation registers the passage premise the pickup and drop-off area before the outing is dispatched to a vehicle. It doesn’t mull over the vehicle number before registering the admission,” a Uber representative conceded.

Does Ola calculation additionally take after a comparable example of collecting extra charges in names of assessments, notwithstanding when the state does not exact?

Ola sent us a standard answer because of a survey.

“All rides at the Ola stage conform to the expense structures determined by the particular state governments. The receipt imparted to the client, once the ride is closed, offers a point by point reprieve up of the charges required,” Ola representative said in an announcement to Moneycontrol.

Organizations avoid inquiries on UP bound travelers…

There is another catch in the exacting of expenses on travelers. A taxi driver is required the Rs 120 only once in 24 hours if his taxicab is enrolled outside UP.

This charge is gathered from the traveler as Rs 100 “additional charge” when they go to Noida or Ghaziabad.

Notwithstanding if a driver gets more than one outing to UP, Uber still demands an extra charge of Rs 100 on the second, third or fourth traveler, notwithstanding when the state government is not gathering any further expenses in a 24 hour time frame on a non-state taxicab.

“The Municipal Corporation of Delhi charges toll each time a vehicle enters Delhi and Uber incorporates this toll in forthright passage, when a rider enters get and drop-off areas that require crossing state fringes to enter Delhi,” a Uber representative said without remarking looking into it of Uttar Pradesh.

We asked Uber for what valid reason does the passage not go down once a home state numbered taxicab is assigned to a client sitting in Delhi.

The organization said that the duty gathered by Haryana when vehicles enter the state is excluded in the toll Uber charges from its riders.

Specialists say that the perfect way ought to be that the drivers take month to month allows and after that the organizations can partition the assessment among every one of the clients.

“The second thing could be that – on the off chance that you are doing a first trek you can deduct a charge from the client yet in the event that you making a moment or a third excursion and on the off chance that it is not brought about by you, at that point you ought not charge the client,” included Jaspal Singh, a vehicle industry investigator and prime supporter of Valoriser Consultants.

Uber and Ola dodged the inquiry on home state taxicabs handling towards Uttar Pradesh from Delhi or Gurgaon.

Overenthusiastic step taken by IT Department noted by Jagmohan Garg News

Jagmohan Garg News about the seat scrutinized the division for taking an ‘overenthusiastic stride’ for the situation and requesting that the media house to pay Rs 429 crore .

jagmohan garg it

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday guided the Income Tax office to not make any coercive move against NDTV after the division requested Rs 429 crore from the news channel for the 2009-’10 evaluation year, PTI revealed.

The High Court additionally reprimanded the I-T Department for taking an “overenthusiastic stride” and requesting that the media house make a prompt installment. “How might you pass a punishment arrange when no time has been given for the installment of the sum, which was resolved on July 26?” the High Court seat said.

Judges S Muralidhar and Pratibha Singh said the case at first sight appeared to be supportive of NDTV.

In July, the I-T office had issued a show-cause see against the TV channel requesting that they pay Rs 429 crore quickly. Backer Harish Salve, showing up for NDTV, said the July 26 arrange was issued without the right ward.

Jagmohan Garg News said the I-T division’s request that the sum be stored instantly was “on the substance of it illicit”. The division’s guidance Sanjay Jain requested that the High Court coordinate NDTV for a halfway store of the sum. The seat, be that as it may, denied it.

The protest against NDTV was recorded by Sanjay Dutt, executive of Quantum Services Private Limited. NDTV originator Radhika Roy and the channel’s Executive Chairperson Prannoy Roy have been blamed for “washing reserves” of Rs 403.85 crore to make enthusiasm for support of a shell organization. They have been blamed for “conferring misrepresentation” and “causing wilful loss of over Rs 48 crores to ICICI Bank and the investors of NDTV. The bank is likewise blamed for giving a markdown on the premium payable on the advance.

Labour department lacks manpower to implement in Delhi notify by Jagmohan Garg

Jagmohan Garg News highlights Delhi government’s decision to increase minimum wages by 34 percent, trade bodies reveal that the Department of Labour lacks adequate manpower to implement the same.

Anurag Saxena, leader of the Centre of Trade Union leader as well as member of Delhi government’s committee for all the scheduled employments under the Minimum Wages Act of 1948, reveals that there are only 11 labour inspectors in Delhi government’s labour department.

The revelation has come at a time when the department is continuing a programme to create awareness about the new minimum wages. The awareness programme is to continue till July 13.

Jagmohan Garg News also explain, How can one even expect merely 11 labour inspectors to implement the newly approved minimum wages in a city with more than 20 lakh labourers.

Ashok Agarwal, an advocate in the Delhi High Court, says, “The Delhi government could not even implement the earlier rates of minimum wages due to lack of manpower. How can they do it now?”

The labour department, he adds, is overburdened with work, as there are 24 labour laws in the capital state and the department has only 170 employees to implement them.

“The entire department is functioning on 24 percent of the staff strength (that was) prevalent in the 1970s,” he added.

Lallan Singh, a deputy labour commissioner admits that his office has nearly 40 percent shortage of manpower.

Recently, Delhi labour minister Gopal Rai announced that teams would be formed under deputy labour commissioners to implement the new minimum wages.

Addressing workers on Labour Day at a function, according to NDTV, Rai had said that “the department has been directed to take up all complaints regarding non-payment of new minimum wages on priority and their disposal should be in a time-bound manner”.

However, Agarwal questions the efficacy of the teams in implementing the new minimum wages since only labour inspectors are authorised to inspect and draw prosecutions on erring concerns.

The Minimum Wages Act 1948 lays out clear provision in Section 19 that a person notified as inspector can only implement this act.

The Aam Admi Party government in Delhi had increased the daily wages by 34 percent by a cabinet decision to be implemented from 1 April 2017.

As per this new notification, the minimum wages of unskilled labourers were increased from Rs 9, 724 to Rs 13, 350 per month. For semi-skilled workers, it has been increased from monthly Rs 10,764 to Rs 14,698. However, skilled workers after this increase should get Rs 16,182 monthly instead of Rs 11,830, which was the prevalent rate of minimum wages.

The Aam Aadmi Party had made increase of minimum wages an integral part of its political narrative right in its election manifesto during the last Delhi Assembly election.

“But merely increasing minimum wages is not going to help, as it is not possible for 11 inspectors to inspect thousands of shops, factories and other establishments,” says Agarwal.

Saxena says that though the decision to increase the minimum wages was the need of the hour, and thanks the government for fulfilling his unions long standing demand, he states that the increase of minimum wages would make sense only when the labour department recruits enough officials to implement them.

Firstpost visited the labour commissioner’s office to learn its view about the lack of labour inspectors to implement the minimum wages, but none of the officials approached responded the queries.

Jagmohan Garg talking about Uber secret program

jagmohan garg uberJagmohan Garg highlights Uber utilized a mystery program named “Damnation” to track Lyft drivers to check whether they were driving for both ride-hailing administrations and generally smother rivalry.

It’s the most recent in a progression of inconveniences for Uber, which is additionally managing official flights and allegations of sexism and lewd behavior.

Jagmohan Garg also added about Uber workers, including CEO Travis Kalanick, thought about the program, as indicated by a story in The Information, which depended on a mysterious source who was not approved to talk freely.

The program was stopped in mid 2016, as indicated by the report. An agent for Uber did not react to messages for input on Thursday. Lyft said in an announcement to the distribution that “assuming genuine, the assertions are extremely concerning.”

A month ago, another report surfaced about an alternate mystery following weapon with a vile sounding name. “Greyball,” as it was called, distinguished controllers who were acting like riders while attempting to gather prove that Uber’s administration was infringing upon neighborhood laws overseeing taxis. The administration permitted Uber to obstruct those endeavors by scratching off agents’ ride demands.

Uber recognized that it utilized Greyball, and after the New York Times report turned out the organization said it would close down the framework.